Note from archiver<at>cs.uu.nl:
Since januari 2019, this archive is no longer maintained/updated.
This page is part of a big collection
of Usenet postings, archived here for your convenience.
For matters concerning the content of this page,
please contact its author(s); use the
source, if all else fails.
For matters concerning the archive as a whole, please refer to the
or contact the archiver.
Subject: comp.lang.eiffel Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
This article was archived around: 07 Oct 2007 04:22:13 GMT
Posting-Frequency: approximately monthly
Last-modified: 05 May 2006
EIFFEL: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
This question-and-answer list is posted monthly to the Usenet
newsgroups comp.lang.eiffel, comp.answers and news.answers.
Please send corrections and comments to email@example.com
This information is abstracted and condensed from the posts of many
contributors to comp.lang.eiffel, supplemented by information from
vendors. No guarantees are made regarding its accuracy.
This compilation is by Franck Arnaud. Distribution is unrestricted.
It builds on the work of the previous maintainers: Rock Howard,
Roger Browne, Conrad Taylor in chronological order.
You can get the latest from the web:
or by sending an email message to firstname.lastname@example.org with this
Changes since the last posting:
QCOM Added GEC; all commercial compiler also open source
QSTD Added ECMA standard
Frequently Asked Questions:
QEIF What is Eiffel?
QORI Where did Eiffel come from?
QCOM What Eiffel compilers are available?
QLIB What Eiffel libraries are available?
QFRE Is Eiffel available as free software?
QARC Is there an archive of the comp.lang.eiffel newsgroup?
QBOK What books are available for learning about Eiffel?
QWEB Where can I find Eiffel on the World-Wide-Web?
QEDI Where can I get an Eiffel editor or emacs-mode?
QBON What is BON?
QSTD Are there standards for the Eiffel language?
QPOR How do I write portable applications?
QTGV How fast do Eiffel applications run?
QGRP Are there any Eiffel user groups?
QADR Where can I get Eiffel products and services?
QCNF Are there any conferences for Eiffel users?
QECC Why do many Eiffel implementations compile to C?
QJVM Where can I get an Eiffel to Java compiler?
QNET Where can I get an Eiffel to .NET compiler?
LFEA What features does Eiffel have?
LCHN What changes have been made to the Eiffel language definition?
LLIB What libraries come with Eiffel?
LDBC What's the big deal about preconditions and postconditions?
LOLD What is does the 'old' keyword mean?
LCQS What is command/query separation?
LCON Please explain and discuss covariance vs. contravariance.
LCAT Is it true that there are "holes" in the Eiffel type system?
LTSK Is there support for concurrency in Eiffel?
LOVL Why doesn't Eiffel allow function overloading?
LINC Why is there no increment operator?
LAGE What are Eiffel agents?
LATR Why are there no class attributes in Eiffel?
LPAR How can I call the parent-class version of a redefined
LEVC Where can I find a comparison between Eiffel and C++?
LDES Are there any destructors in Eiffel?
LDIS How do I implement multiple inheritance efficiently?
LISA How does the `Iterating several actions' example in ETL work?
LORB Is COM/CORBA supported?
QEIF: What is Eiffel?
Eiffel is an advanced object-oriented programming language and
method that emphasizes the design and construction of high-quality
and reusable software.
Eiffel is not a superset or extension of any other language. Eiffel
strongly encourages OO programming and does not allow dangerous
practices from previous generation languages although it does
interface to other languages such as C and C++. Eiffel supports the
concept of "Design by Contract" to improve software correctness.
Beyond the language aspect Eiffel may be viewed as a method of
software construction. Eiffel is an excellent vehicle for software
education, including for a first programming course.
QORI: Where did Eiffel come from?
Eiffel was created by Bertrand Meyer and developed by his company,
Eiffel Software Inc. of Goleta, CA.
Dr. Meyer borrowed on his extensive experience with OOP, particularly
with Simula. He also added in important concepts from his academic
work on software verification and computer language definition.
Eiffel's design addresses many practical concerns that software
engineers face when creating complex software. Eiffel has evolved
continually since its conception on September 14, 1985 and its first
introduction in 1986.
Eiffel is named after Gustave Eiffel, the engineer who designed the
QCOM: What Eiffel compilers are available?
The following Eiffel compilers are currently available and supported
by their vendors or authors. The list is ordered by date of first
In the case of commercial products, the price is not mentioned because
there can be varying conditions depending on platforms, conditions of
use (personal vs. professional), etc. Please check with the vendors'
web-sites for up to date pricing information.
In the list below, the 'target' entry indicates what code is produced
by the compiler. Most -- but not all -- compilers produce C code so a
supported C compiler may be needed. Some compilers or distributions
include a freeware C compiler.
In the 'platform' entry, an indication of supported platforms is given.
"Win32" means 32 bit version of Windows on Intel x86. "Unix" means
various Unices, check with vendor for the actual list of platforms.
All vendors supporting Unix do support Linux on Intel x86.
Vendor: Eiffel Software, Inc., USA
Product: EiffelStudio / EiffelENViSioN
Licensing conditions: Dual commercial / open source
Platforms: Win32, Unix, .NET, VMS
This product, formerly known as ISE Eiffel, is available either as
a stand alone development environment (EiffelStudio) or integrated
into Visual Studio for .NET (Eiffel ENViSioN). It includes:
- a complete graphical development environment with
unique facilities for power browsing, documentation, symbolic
debugging, fast compilations and more. It also supports a diagram
tool based on the BON method.
- EiffelBase, which is also available under an open source license,
is a complete and professional set of classes covering containers,
collections, I/O, iterators, object persistence, searching, etc.
- EiffelVision2, a powerful multiplatform graphical library.
- Under Windows, the Windows Eiffel Library (WEL), combining the
power of Eiffel with access to the Windows API and the EiffelCOM
library to create/reuse existing COM components.
- Many other libraries: EiffelNet, EiffelLex, EiffelParse, EiffelWeb,
EiffelStore, Eiffel2Java, EiffelThread, EiffelTime
Vendor: Dominique Colnet et al
Product: SmartEiffel the GNU Eiffel compiler
Licensing conditions: Freeware (GPL)
Target: ANSI C / Java Virtual Machine
Platforms: Most with ANSI C compiler
SmartEiffel is intended to be a complete, though small and very fast,
free Eiffel compiler, available for a wide range of platforms.
It includes an Eiffel to C compiler, an Eiffel to Java bytecode
compiler, a documentation tool, a pretty printer, etc.
The compiler uses an innovative strategy involving whole system
analysis which allows compilation to be often faster than the
incremental compilation of traditional compilers.
It was originally designed (under the name SmallEiffel) at the
LORIA lab, Nancy, France, in 1994-95, and has since been used
worldwide by many individuals and universities.
Vendor: Object Tools GmbH, Germany
Product: Visual Eiffel
Licensing conditions: Dual commercial / open source
Target: Native Intel x86 (ia32)
Platforms: Win32, Linux (command line tools)
Web: http://visual-eiffel.com/ or http://visual-eiffel.org/
Using Visual Eiffel and DM will help you to develop complex Windows
applications in a very short time. Visual Eiffel gives you
- an integrated workbench with the Windows look and feel
- a professional Eiffel compiler producing very efficient native
code for Intel processors
- DM - the most rapid RAD tool you have ever seen gives you
everything to build applications for Windows fast.
- many useful libraries for the production of commercial Windows
applications - for ActiveX component integration, for ODBC access,
for the creation of nice graphical packages and much more.
Vendor: Object Tools GmbH, Germany
Product: Eiffel for OS X
Licensing conditions: Commercial (free eval)
Target: ANSI C
Platforms: Mac OS (PowerPC)
Based on Object Tools' original Eiffel/S compiler, Eiffel
for the Macintosh runs under Mac OS X.
The compiler is available as an add-on for either Apple
ProjectBuilder and or MetrowWerks CodeWarrior.
It includes the usual kernel libraries and also Eiffel
libraries wrapping the Macintosh API, both Cocoa and Carbon.
The earlier version for MacOS 8 and 9 is available at
Vendor: Gobo Project
Product: Gobo Eiffel Compiler
Licensing conditions: Open source
Target: ANSI C
Platforms: ANSI C compiler
This compiler, written by Eric Bezault, aims at being a
fast compiler producing fast code, while maintaining
maximum compatibility with Eiffel Software's compiler
and the ECMA standard.
Part of the Gobo Eiffel libraries project, it is
currently in beta version and under heavy development,
so not all the planned features are ready but it is
already capable of compiling all the code in the Gobo
Other Eiffel compilers are worth mentioning although they may be
either not supported any more, or an older version, or at an early
stage of development so that their implementation of the language
may be far from complete.
- SIG Eiffel/S, version 1.3: this was the first Eiffel 3 compiler,
and the first compiler available on the PC platform. Version 1.3,
which is a few years old, is still available as shareware from Object
Tools (formerly SIG) at http://www.object-tools.com/.
It is a command line compiler producing C code, and it is available
for DOS32, Windows 95 and NT and many Unix platforms.
- TowerEiffel was a commercial compiler with an emphasis on the speed
of generated code. It stopped being actively maintained and sold after
Tower Technology moved on to write a static Java compiler using the
same kinds of system-wide optimisations found in most Eiffel compilers.
- iss-base was a compiler and environment from Halstenbach ACT GmbH.
It started out as a licensed derivative of ISE Eiffel, but the
development forked afterwards and the core compiler was developed
independently and for a while became one of the best performing
Eiffel compilers. The development environment remained almost
unchanged, but independently developed add on libraries and a UI
builder were added. The product is currently not being publicised.
- There has been various other compiler projects which are not widely
used: EON Eiffel, an Eiffel to C++ compiler, written
in C++, not actively maintained; J-Eiffel, a compiler generating
JVM bytecode from Pirmin Kalberer; and Fridtjof Siebert's FEC, a
native code compiler for Sun SPARC machines.
QLIB: What Eiffel libraries are available?
Eiffel vendors usually supply a large set of libraries with their
compilers, and provide others as additions.
Many libraries, usually open source, are available from third
parties and are too numerous to list here. See QWEB for reference
websites which have listings of available libraries. A good
starting point is at:
QFRE: Is Eiffel available as free software?
SmartEiffel is an open source compiler, provided as a highly
portable C package that can compile on most ANSI C platforms.
The full Eiffel source code of the compiler itself (in
Eiffel) is included. See QCOM.
A ready-to-run package for Windows, including a freeware C
compiler, is available at http://elj.sourceforge.net/
Many commercial vendors offer free evaluation versions, with
some limitations. Commercial vendors often also have cheap
entry-level versions for popular platforms like Win32 and
Linux on x86 PCs.
QARC: Is there an archive of the comp.lang.eiffel newsgroup?
Yes, it is on Google groups:
QBOK: What books are available for learning about Eiffel?
Title: Object-Oriented Software Construction, second edition
Author: Bertrand Meyer
ISBN: ISBN 0-13-629155-4 - Prentice Hall 1997
Short: This book is the comprehensive reference on all aspects of
object technology, from design principles to O-O techniques,
Design by Contract, O-O analysis, concurrency, persistence,
abstract data types and many more. While Eiffel is only
presented as the 'notation' used to illustrate the concept,
it is essential reading for any Eiffelist -- it includes a
rather complete description of the 'notation'. It comes with
a CD-ROM containing the complete hyperlinked text,
supplementary material, and a version of ISE Eiffel.
Title: Eiffel: The Language
Author: Bertrand Meyer
ISBN: ISBN 0-13-247925-7 -- Prentice Hall 1992
Short: This book combines an introduction to Eiffel, the language
reference, and a good deal of philosophy into its 600 pages.
This is a rigorous and comprehensive book which some readers
may find heavy going despite Dr. Meyer's clarity of expression.
It is the definitive language reference, and essential reading
for all serious Eiffel users. Get the second or later printing
(same ISBN), which includes many corrections and changes (there
is not a second edition, and none is currently underway). This
book is also available in French (ISBN 2-7296-0525-8).
Title: Design by Contract, by Example
Author: Richard Mitchell, James McKim
ISBN: 0-20-163460-0 -- Addison Wesley 2001
Short: An example-based guide to Design by Contract.
Title: Design Patterns and Contracts
Author: JM Jezequel, M Train, C Mingins -- ISBN 0-20-130959-9 -- AW 1999
Short: This book builds on the work on software design patterns
as published in the 'Gang of Four' book by Gamma et al. Design
by Contract is applied to design patterns.
Title: Objects Unencapsulated: Java, Eiffel, and C++?
Author: Ian Joyner -- ISBN 0-13-014269-7 -- PH 1999
Short: An examination of the core of object-oriented technology
through a comparison between Java, Eiffel and C++.
Title: Object Oriented Programming in Eiffel, 2nd edition
Author: Pete Thomas and Ray Weedon -- ISBN: 0-201-33131-4 -- AW 1997
Short: This book is a very comprehensive Eiffel tutorial and textbook,
with a solid "Abstract Data Type" approach.
Title: Algorithms and Data Structures
Author: Jeffrey Kingston -- ISBN: 0-201-40374-9 -- AW 1997
Short: A treatment of the central algorithms and data structures of
computer science, including complete Eiffel implementations.
Title: An Object-Oriented Introduction to Computer Science Using Eiffel
Author: Richard Wiener -- ISBN: 0-13-838725 -- PH 1997
Title: Object Technology for Scientific Computing Object-Oriented
Numerical Software in Eiffel and C
Author: Paul Dubois -- ISBN: 0-13-267808-X -- PH 1996
Short: Accompanying CD with the Free Eiffel for UNIX & Linux
Title: Object-Oriented Software Engineering with Eiffel
Author: Jean-Marc Jezequel -- ISBN: 0-201-63381-7 -- AW 1996
Short: A comprehensive guide to Eiffel. In addition to describing
Eiffel, the book contains descriptions and comparisons of
compilers and libraries available on the market.
Title: Object Structures: Building OO Software Components with Eiffel
Author: Jacob Gore -- ISBN: 0-201-63480-5 -- AW 1996
Short: This is the first "data structures" book for Eiffel, bringing
to the study of that language the first comprehensive
treatment of one of the most important topics in any
Title: Eiffel Object-Oriented Programming
Author: John Tyrrell -- ISBN: 0-333-64554-5 -- 1995
Short: This is an inexpensive and very approachable book.
Title: Software Development Using Eiffel: There can be life other than C++
Author: Richard Wiener -- ISBN: 0-13-100686-X -- PH 1995
Short: This is a useful book with a lot of code examples for those
with a grounding in another OO language.
Title: Object Success
Author: Bertrand Meyer -- ISBN: 0-13-192833-3 -- PH 1995
Short: This book is a manager's guide to object orientation, its
impact on the corporation and its use for re-engineering the
Title: Object Oriented Programming in Eiffel
Author: R. Rist and R. Terwilliger -- ISBN: 0-13-205931-2 -- PH 1995
Short: This is a textbook with an emphasis on design.
Title: Seamless Object-Oriented Software Architecture: Analysis and
Design of Reliable Systems
Author: Kim Walden & Jean-Marc Nerson -- ISBN: 0-13-031303-3 -- PH 1994
Short: This book describes the Business Object Notation (BON) Method
Title: Reusable Software: The Base Object-Oriented Component Libraries
Author: Bertrand Meyer -- ISBN: 0-13-245499-8 -- PH 1994
Short: This book describes principles of library design and the
taxonomy of fundamental computing structures. Serves as a
manual for the EiffelBase libraries.
Title: An Object-Oriented Environment: Principles and Application
Author: Bertrand Meyer -- ISBN: 0-13-245507-2 -- PH 1994
Short: This book describes the ISE EiffelBench environment as well as
the "Melting Ice" compilation technology and the EiffelBuild
GUI application builder.
Title: Object-Oriented Applications
Author: Meyer and Nerson editors -- ISBN: 0-13-013798-7 -- PH 1993
Short: This book includes an introduction to Eiffel technology
followed by seven in-depth descriptions of large applications
written in Eiffel.
Title: Eiffel: An Introduction
Author: Robert Switzer -- ISBN: 0-13-105909-2 -- PH 1993
Short: This book is a very clear and concise Eiffel primer, with many
code fragments and two substantial Eiffel applications. Also
available in French (ISBN 2-225-84-656-1).
Title: Object Oriented Software Construction, first edition
Author: Bertrand Meyer -- ISBN: 0-13-629049-3 -- PH 1988
Short: An earlier edition of the second edition mentioned above, based
on a previous version of the language.
Also available in French, German, Italian, Dutch, etc.
Publishers are Addison Wesley (AW) and Prentice Hall (PH).
QWEB: Where can I find Eiffel on the World-Wide-Web?
Cetus Links is a directory of resources on object-oriented
programming, including useful Eiffel pages.
The home of the Gobo Eiffel project.
The main vendors websites are:
Eiffel Software http://www.eiffel.com/
Object Tools http://www.object-tools.com/
QEDI: Where can I get an Eiffel editor or emacs-mode?
Tower Technology developed an Eiffel 3 emacs mode that supports
syntax-directed highlighting, auto-indentation and is easily
customized for font use, color and indentation amounts.
The WINEDIT shareware programmer's editor offers colour syntax
highlighting, works with Eiffel/S under MS-Windows, and is available
from all main Windows shareware archives.
Alan Philips' free Programmers File Editor also works with Eiffel/S
under MS-Windows, has templates but not syntax highlighting, available
The vim editor, an enhanced version of Unix's vi, includes Reimer
Behrend's Eiffel syntax file as part of the standard distribution,
An Eiffel extension to the Windows programmers editor Codewright
from Premia implements chromacoding of Eiffel code, smart indenting
and some templates; from http://www.nenie.org/eiffel/free/
The commercial Windows editor TextPad (http://www.textpad.com/) has
a number of Eiffel syntax highlighting extensions.
QBON: What is BON?
BON ("Business Object Notation") is a method for high-level analysis
and design, offering a seamless reversible transition to an Eiffel
implementation. The method emphasizes Design by Contract and
systematic development. It is described in Walden and Nerson's book
'Seamless Object-Oriented Software Architecture' which is available
online at http://www.bon-method.com/ along with other resources
on the method.
Eiffel Software supports BON within EiffelStudio.
QSTD: Are there standards for the Eiffel language?
The definition of the Eiffel language is in the public domain. This
definition was initially controlled by NICE, the Non-profit
International Consortium for Eiffel, a group of Eiffel vendors
and users. Membership is currently free and anyone interested in
the promotion and standardisation of the language can join.
Most of the standardisation work has been taken over by an
ECMA committee who produced ECMA 367, the new Eiffel standard:
It supercedes Bertrand Meyer's book, "Eiffel: The Language" (2nd
Printing). A draft of the next edition of this book incorporating
the new standard and to be titled "Standard Eiffel", is available
online from Bertrand Meyer's page at ETH:
QPOR: How do I write portable applications?
It is possible to achieve reasonable code portability between
supported Eiffel compilers, when care is taken not to use proprietary
features or new extensions or obscure features of the language
whose implementations may vary.
Portability between several operating systems supported by a
given compiler is generally quite good.
The situation is less straightforward with libraries. The
only official library standard is the ELKS-2001 kernel standard.
The core features and classes are portable if vendor-specific
features are avoided, but the functionality coverage is limited.
ELKS-2001 does not include container classes (except ARRAY). Eiffel
Software has released its data structure library, EiffelBase, as open
source, and some other vendors support it with their compiler but it
does not work with others.
Eric Bezault's open source Gobo library (http://www.gobosoft.com/) is
probably the most widely used alternative library, and it has been
made portable to all current compilers. It includes an EiffelBase
emulation cluster so that most applications developed using
EiffelBase can be ported to any compiler using Gobo. Beyond
data structures, it includes essential functionality not
covered in ELKS-95 and abstractions of some differences between
QTGV: How fast do Eiffel applications run?
Eiffel is a statically typed object-oriented language using
automatic memory management.
Many Eiffel compilers make use of the static typing and perform
extensive global optimisations producing performance comparable
with other well-optimised statically typed languages like C++.
Eiffel's assertions are normally enabled during development,
and inevitably slow down execution. Assertions are not usually
compiled in production binaries and so have no impact on the
performance of optimised code.
The cost of garbage collection is an often debated point, and
large applications are often dominated by memory management rather
than computation. In principle a style of programming assuming a GC
could be more efficient than typical manual memory management. In
any case, there is nothing in Eiffel making garbage collection less
efficient than with any other language where it is used.
QGRP: Are there any Eiffel user groups?
Compiler vendors usually run user groups for their user base, often
in the form of a mailing-list or meetings during conferences. Contact
the individual vendors for more information.
A number of online discussion groups about Eiffel are hosted at Eiffel
Software's discussion site (http://www.talkitover.com/) and on Yahoo
Groups (http://groups.yahoo.com/). These sites provide both e-mail and
Many Eiffel projects are hosted at Sourceforge, the free open source
hosting site. http://www.sourceforge.net/
South American users of Eiffel can look at the home page of RIPLEG
(Rio de la Plata Eiffel Group). http://www.ripleg.com.ar/
The Colorado Eiffel User's Group meets in Denver and has a mailing
list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colorado_eiffel_users/
GFUE is the user group for French speakers.
QADR: Where can I get Eiffel products and services?
These vendors, resellers and suppliers of Eiffel training and
consultancy are listed in alphabetical order:
- Cap Gemini France, Division ITMI, http://www.capgemini.fr/
- Class Technology Pty. Ltd., http://www.class.com.au/
- Eiffel Ireland, http://www.eiffel.ie/Eiffel/
- Enea Data, http://www.enea.se/
- Everything Eiffel, http://www.eiffel.demon.co.uk/
- Information and Math Science Lab Inc., http://www.imslab.co.jp/
- Eiffel Software, Inc. http://www.eiffel.com/
- Object Tools GmbH, http://www.object-tools.com/
QCNF: Are there any conferences for Eiffel users?
TOOLS is an international conference devoted to the applications of
OO technology. It is organised by Eiffel Software and a popular conference
with Eiffelists. EiffelStudio user group meetings occur concurrently.
The ACM SIGPLAN Conference On Object-Oriented Programming Systems,
Languages and Applications (OOPSLA) is probably the largest technical
conference about OO Technology.
ECOOP is the annual European Conference for Object-Oriented
QECC: Why do many Eiffel implementations compile to C?
By using C as a target language, an Eiffel implementor can:
- bring Eiffel to the marketplace faster and at lower cost
- port their implementation more easily to other platforms
- take advantage of optimisation provided by the C compiler
Much of the technology that makes Eiffel relatively simple to use also
makes it more difficult to implement than say a native code Pascal
Compiling Eiffel to C seems to work well under Unix. C is sometimes
thought of as the native code of Unix.
Still, there are quite a few compilers that can compile to other
targets, such as the Java or .NET virtual machines, or x86
QJVM: Where can I get an Eiffel to Java compiler?
An Eiffel compiler that targets the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) is
a common request. While it is tempting to think that this could be
done so that there total interoperability between Java and Eiffel
code, things are not as simple as they look at first sight.
There are fundamental differences between the Java and Eiffel object
models (dynamic vs. static object systems, single vs. multiple
inheritance, design by contract vs. wishful thinking, are among the
While it is of course possible to provide a compiler from Eiffel to
the JVM (which is a Turing machine), it comes necessarily at a cost,
be it performance or interoperability or both. It is unlikely in the
foreseeable future to have an Eiffel to JVM compiler where it is
possible to mix and match freely classes written in Java and Eiffel
classes without having to worry about which language they are
Nevertheless, most compiler vendors are moving towards providing
some support for the JVM, with differing limitations depending on
the vendor and implementation strategy.
SmartEiffel is the first compiler available to produce some
usable result on the JVM. Eiffel Software and Object Tools
have announced ongoing efforts to support Java.
QNET: Where can I get an Eiffel to .NET compiler?
Eiffel Software's current compiler includes the ability to
generate code for Microsoft's Common Language Infrastructure,
the .NET runtime environment. Eiffel Software is also
involved in the ECMA (European Computer Manufacturers
Association) standardisation effort for the CLI. Both
the standalone environment and the add-on for Visual
Studio (ENViSioN) can be used to produce .NET code.
While the early version of this .NET target only supported a
ad-hoc subset of Eiffel, the current version supports the
full Eiffel language. Features of Eiffel not directly supported
by the .NET object model, are implemented on top of the core
LFEA: What features does Eiffel have?
Eiffel is a pure, statically typed, object-oriented language. Its
modularity is based on classes. Its most notable feature is probably
design by contract. It brings design and programming closer together.
It encourages maintainability and the re-use of software components.
Eiffel offers classes, multiple inheritance, polymorphism, static
typing and dynamic binding, genericity (constrained and
unconstrained), a disciplined exception mechanism, systematic use of
assertions to promote programming by contract.
Eiffel has an elegant design and programming style, and is easy to
An overview is available at
LCHN: What changes have been made to the Eiffel language definition?
Eiffel is still a relatively new language, and there have been a
number of changes to its definition.
There were significant changes between the publication of
"Object-Oriented Software Construction", first edition in 1988,
and the release of Eiffel 2.3.
More significant changes came with the introduction of Eiffel 3, the
current and only version of the language in use today. These changes
are summarised in Eiffel: The Language.
There were some less significant changes between the first
and second printings of "Eiffel: The Language": new
non-expanded basic types (INTEGER_REF, REAL_REF, etc), POINTER
type to enable external references to be passed around, call to
external routines no longer implicitly pass the current
object as the first parameter.
Since then the following change has been adopted and widely
- The Precursor construct allows the ancestor's version of
a redefined feature to be conveniently called (see LPAR).
- A keyword-based notation (create/creation) for object creation
was introduced as an alternative to the "!!" notation.
Bertrand Meyer is currently working on Eiffel: The Language,
third edition, which will describe a significantly updated version
of the language, known as 'Eiffel 5'. Some of the constructs being
introduced, like Agents (routines as a first class construct),
have already found their way into Eiffel Software's implementation.
The draft for this next edition is reachable from Bertrand Meyer's
home page at http://www.inf.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/
LLIB: What libraries come with Eiffel?
All vendors aim to support the Eiffel Library Standard kernel classes.
In addition, extensive library classes are supplied with the compilers
including data structures, graphics, lexical analysis and parsing, IO,
persistence, formatting, GUI and more.
Many libraries are provided by third parties, mostly as open source
code. There are too many to list here. A good starting point is at
LDBC: What's the big deal about preconditions and postconditions?
The big deal is that it supports programming by contract. For example,
preconditions (require clauses) are simple boolean statements that are
used to check that the input arguments are valid and that the object
is in a reasonable state to do the requested operation. If not, an
exception is generated. Similarly, postconditions (ensure clauses)
make sure that a method has successfully performed its duties, thus
"fulfilling its contract" with the caller. Invariants are boolean
expressions that are checked every time an object method returns back
to a separate object.
You can use these ideas in any OO programming language, but usually
must supply your own assertion mechanisms or rely on programmer
discipline. In Eiffel, the ideas are integrated into the whole fabric
of the environment. We find them used by:
- the exception handling mechanism.
(Tracebacks almost always identify the correct culprit code since
preconditions almost always denote an error in the calling method,
while postconditions denote an error in the called method.)
- the automatic compilation system.
(Assertions can be disabled entirely or selectively by type on a
per class basis.)
- the Eiffel compiler.
(Invariants, preconditions and postconditions are all inherited in
a manner that makes logical sense.)
(Assertion expressions are not allowed to produce side effects so
they can be omitted without effect.)
- the automatic documentation tools.
(Preconditions and postconditions are important statements about
what a method does, often effectively describing the "contract"
between the caller and callee. Invariants can yield information
about legal states an object can have.)
In the future we expect to see formal methods technology work its way
into the assertion capability. This will allow progressively more
powerful constraints to be put into place. In addition, Meyer has
argued in his concurrency model (see LTSK) that assertions play
a central role in concurrent and distributed object-oriented
LOLD: What does the 'old' keyword mean?
"The value of an Old expression old e is [...] the result
that would have been produced by evaluation e just before
the call's execution began." (ETL2, p.125). This is
useful in postconditions.
When using the keyword with a reference, it is clear
from the definition that the value of "old a" will be
the object to which 'a' referred at the beginning of
the routine, and not the old value of the actual
object. Obtaining a copy of 'a', if that is the
required semantics, has to be done explicitly:
... old (clone (a)) ...
This makes senses because copy and identity are issues
with multiple solutions -- a shallow copy as done by
'clone' by default may not be enough for instance -- and
a compiler cannot be reasonably expected to guess correctly
which interpretation is appropriate for a given usage.
LCQS: What is command/query separation?
It is a convention in Eiffel that functions (routines
that return something) must not have side effects. This
means all routines changing the state of an object should
be procedures, not functions. If they return a result,
a helper attribute can be used.
For instance, a typical Eiffel class representing a
facility to read a file will offer a routine to read
a line, and make the result available separately, so
a client will do:
a_file.read_line -- read_line is a procedure
This is essential for design by contract, because assertions
are boolean expressions that must not change the state of the
objects, otherwise the program will behave differently when
assertions are checked.
Internal side effects, that change the concrete but not
the abstract state of the object and are not visible from
outside are acceptable.
LCON: Please explain and discuss covariance vs. contravariance.
Consider the following situation: we have two classes PARENT and
CHILD. CHILD inherits from PARENT, and redefines PARENT's feature
foo (arg: A) is ...
PARENT redefine foo end
foo (arg: B) is ...
The question is: what restrictions are placed on the type of argument
to 'foo', that is 'A' and 'B'? (If they are the same, there is no
Here are two possibilities:
(1) B must be a child of A (the covariant rule - so named because
in the child class the types of arguments in redefined
routines are children of types in the parent's routine, so the
inheritance "varies" for both in the same direction)
(2) B must be a parent of A (the contravariant rule)
Eiffel uses the covariant rule.
At first, the contravariant rule seems theoretically appealing. Recall
that polymorphism means that an attribute can hold not only objects of
its declared type, but also of any descendant (child) type. Dynamic
binding means that a feature call on an attribute will trigger the
corresponding feature call for the *actual* type of the object, which
may be a descendant of the declared type of the attribute. With
contravariance, we can assign an object of descendant type to an
attribute, and all feature calls will still work because the
descendant can cope with feature arguments at least as general as
those of the ancestor. In fact, the descendant object is in every way
also a fully-valid instance of the ancestor object: we are using
inheritance to implement subtyping.
However, in programming real-world applications we frequently need to
specialize related classes jointly.
Here is an example, where PLOT_3D inherits from PLOT, and
DATA_SAMPLE_3D inherits from DATA_SAMPLE.
add(arg: DATA_SAMPLE) is ...
PLOT redefine add end
add(arg: DATA_SAMPLE_3D) is ...
This requires the covariant rule, and works well in Eiffel.
It would fail if we were to put a PLOT_3D object into a PLOT attribute
and try to add a DATA_SAMPLE to it. It fails because we have used
inheritance to implement code re-use rather than subtyping, but have
called a feature of the ancestor class on an object of the descendant
class as if the descendant object were a true subtype. It is the
compiler's job to detect and reject this error, to avoid the
possibility of a run-time type error.
Here's another example where a real-world situation suggests a
covariant solution. Herbivores eat plants. Cows are herbivores. Grass
is a plant. Cows eat grass but not other plants.
class HERBIVORE class PLANT
eat(food: PLANT) is ...
class COW class GRASS
feature eat(food: GRASS) is ...
This does what we want. The compiler must stop us from putting a COW
object into a HERBIVORE attribute and trying to feed it a PLANT, but
we shouldn't be trying to do this anyway.
Also consider the container 'diet'. We are not forced to redefine this
feature in descendant classes, because with covariant redefinition of
the argument to 'eat', the feature 'diet' can always contain any
object that can be eaten (e.g. grass for a cow). (With contravariant
redefinition of the argument to 'eat', it would be necessary to
re-open the parent class to make the type of the container 'diet' more
To summarise: Real-world problems often lend themselves to covariant
solutions. Eiffel handles these well. Incorrect programs in the
presence of covariant argument redefinition can cause run-time type
errors unless the compiler catches these.
LCAT: Is it true that there are "holes" in the Eiffel type system?
Eiffel was designed to make it possible to catch all type errors at
compile time, so that no type error can occur at run time.
However, there are some complex cases where the type checking
is difficult. The solution in Eiffel the Language, system level
validity checking, requires a global analysis of the whole system,
which has proven too complex and too impractical to implement.
Object Oriented Software Construction, second edition, offers a new
simpler way to check for those errors that may, if refined, provide
effective type checking but it has been questioned whether it is
too drastic so that it will make many common patterns invalid.
The main system-level type errors are:
- restriction of exports in a descendant class.
- covariant redefinition of routines parameters as in question LCON.
- covariant signatures in conforming types of a generic class
(like 'put' in LIST[ANY] and LIST[STRING]).
- creation of redefined anchor types.
- more obscure cases like selection of a feature that returns a
precursor type in a multiple inheritance hierarchy, or
indirect assignment of references to an expanded ancestor.
No compiler currently available fully implements these checks and
behaviour in those cases ranges from run-time type errors to system
A comprehensive description of these issues and proposed solutions
is described in this paper:
LTSK: Is there support for concurrency in Eiffel?
Eiffel supports concurrency in the latest specification of the
language. The SCOOP (Simple Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming)
model is described in chapter 30 of the book in "Object Oriented
Software Construction 2nd edition" by Bertrand Meyer. Papers are
also available at
Several researchers and vendors are working towards actual
implementations of SCOOP.
In the meantime, most compilers also support less safe forms
of concurrency, like multithreading, independently of SCOOP.
LOVL: Why doesn't Eiffel allow function overloading?
In Eiffel, no two features of a class may have the same identifier,
regardless of their respective signatures. This prevents the use of
function overloading, a common programming technique in languages
Eiffel is designed to be minimal: it includes exactly the features
that its designer considered necessary, and nothing else.
Because Eiffel already supports (single) polymorphism through its
inheritance system, the only positive thing that function overloading
buys you is reducing the number of feature names, at the expense of
reducing the ability of the compiler to detect (type) errors.
Readability is also enhanced when overloading is not possible. With
overloading you would need to consider the type of the arguments as
well as the type of the target before you can work out which feature
is called. With multiple inheritance and dynamic binding this is
awkward for a compiler and error-prone for a human.
Having said that, the lack of overloading may force us to write some
common mathematical operations (e.g. matrix math) in an awkward
way, and some basic arithmetic expressions are treated specially
(the "arithmetic balancing rule", ETL p385).
LINC: Why is there no increment operator?
In C-like languages, there is an operator used to increment
integer types (++) while in Eiffel one has to write:
an_int := an_int + 1
An operator like ++ would be a procedure, and therefore
change the state of the target. If Eiffel's INTEGER had
this operator, it would become a mutable value, and
lose the benefits it gets from being, along with the other
numeric types, immutable. Mutable numeric types would
allow clients to circumvent safety features of the type
system (function parameter and attribute assignment
restrictions for instance).
LAGE: What are Eiffel agents?
In the early years of Eiffel, the language had no routine types
because having routines as distinct entities outside objects
was seen as incompatible with the OO method.
Nevertheless, it has now been accepted that routines as first
class objects are essential and the 'agents' facility has been
introduced. It has been implemented at least in part in Eiffel
Software's compiler and SmartEiffel. Other active vendors are
likely to follow.
While this feature is new and the standard is being finalised,
the core concepts, routine types and tuples for representing
the parameters and return type of a routine, are now well
An ordinary agent is created within the current object,
which provides a context and makes the facility as expressive as
higher order functions (closures) in functional programming
LATR: Why are there no class attributes in Eiffel?
In Eiffel, the "once" function provides greater functionality in a
more disciplined way. The body of a "once" function is executed once
only per system (not per instance of the class), when it is first
called. Thereafter, the "once" function returns the same Result
without re-executing its body.
Such functions can be used to implement a shared attribute of
reference type, which is initialized on its first use.
A "once" function can be included in a mixin class. The shared
attribute returned by that once function is then available to all
instances of classes which inherit from the mixin class.
LPAR: How can I call the parent-class version of a redefined routine?
This was a problem that required the use of multiple inheritance or
synonyms with earlier versions of Eiffel, before the Precursor
construct was introduced.
This construct has now been implemented by all supported compilers,
so calling a parent version of a redefined routine just requires
using the Precursor keyword in the body of the redefinition.
The construct is described in an a paper at
LEVC: Where can I find a comparison between Eiffel and other languages?
Ian Joyner's "C++ critique" includes a comparison between C++, Eiffel
and other languages. It has been published as a book, Objects
Unencapsulated (see QBOK). It is also available online:
In Richard Wiener's book "Software Development Using Eiffel: There can
be life after C++" (see QBOK).
There is another comparison of Eiffel, C++, Java, and Smalltalk at
LDES: Are there any destructors in Eiffel?
Eiffel objects are garbage-collected, so that there is no need for the
developer to explicitly "destroy" or "free" them.
Nevertheless the need may arise to ensure that certain operations
will automatically take place whenever the garbage collector reclaims
an object. For example if an object describing a file becomes
unreachable and hence is eventually garbage-collected, you may want
to ensure that the operating system file will be closed at that
time. Most implementations of Eiffel provide a mechanism for that
purpose: procedure 'dispose' from the Kernel Library class MEMORY.
Whenever the garbage collector collects an object, it calls 'dispose'
on that object. The procedure does nothing by default. Any class may
inherit from MEMORY and redefine 'dispose' to perform appropriate
actions, such as closing a file. Such actions are sometimes called
Because there is no guarantee as to the order in which the garbage
collector will reclaim objects that have become unreachable, safe
redefinitions of 'dispose' should only act on external resources and
not touch Eiffel object structures which may have already been freed.
LDIS: How do I implement multiple inheritance efficiently?
People with a background in C++ or single-inheritance languages
often think that multiple inheritance carries a penalty because
it cannot be implemented using the classic dispatch table scheme
(where every polymorphic feature has a fixed position in a pointer
table that descendants can customise without breaking any code
using the fixed position of an ancestor's polymorphic feature.)
There are other ways to implement inheritance which allows Eiffel
not to suffer performance problems because of multiple inheritance.
Eiffel compilers generally use one of two methods.
In both cases, we need to assume that every type in the system is
assigned an integer identifier -- the type ID.
The first implementation is the 'sparse matrix' model. Every
polymorphic feature has an associated pointer table with an entry
for each type, indexed by type ID. This allows all polymorphic
calls to be executed at the (same) cost of a single pointer
The immediate drawback of this, is that it generates a rather big
data table (a matrix of all polymorphic routines by all types in
a system). Fortunately, there are sparse matrix algorithms allowing
to compress these tables efficiently by carefully selecting the IDs
(an evident optimisation is to try to group all descendant next
to their parent so that only a short section of the type ID space
need be covered).
The other method is different and uses the equivalent of an inspect
statement on the type ID, calling the appropriate static function for
each concrete dynamic type. In this case, it is obvious that the
compiler needs a global knowledge of the system: for each polymorphic
routine call, it needs to know all concrete subtypes really used in
the system, and all redefinitions of the routines.
At first sight, it could be thought that the inspect statement could
slow down the system. Actual compilers using this solution have proved
that they can be as efficient as (or more than) those implemented
using the first method.
It should now be clear that, for both methods, it is necessary
for the compiler to have at compile time -- or at the very least at
optimisation time -- a view of the complete system. This could appear
like a serious restriction but it is not much of a concern because
optimising Eiffel compilers must have this view in the first place
in order to be able to differentiate between static and polymorphic
routines -- all routines being potentially polymorphic in Eiffel.
LISA: How does the `Iterating several actions' example in ETL work?
The example code page 176 of Eiffel: The Language, 2nd printing does
not work with any widely available compiler. It has confused and
puzzled many newcomers to the language and what it is supposed to
do is not clearly defined in the book.
What the example should do is as follows. When a feature is replicated
under multiple inheritance (renamed so that the feature is now known
under two names) and in the same inheritance clause a routine or
attribute its source text references is also replicated, the routine
body of the first feature should be adapted to call the corresponding
replicated features on each path of the inheritance. The mechanism
is not intended to scale to more complex cases where the replication
does not occur in a single inheritance clause.
This feature is now considered obsolete because agents (see LAGE) are
now available and provide a more convenient solution for this pattern.
LORB: Is COM/CORBA supported?
COM or CORBA support is not built into the language. Most
commercial vendors supporting Windows have a COM package
that is tied to their compiler.
There is an open source CORBA object request broker,
MICO/E, at http://www.math.uni-goettingen.de/micoe/
2ab, Inc., at http://www.2ab.com/, has an Eiffel
binding for their CORBA package which works with ISE