[Comp.Sci.Dept, Utrecht] Note from archiver<at>cs.uu.nl: This page is part of a big collection of Usenet postings, archived here for your convenience. For matters concerning the content of this page, please contact its author(s); use the source, if all else fails. For matters concerning the archive as a whole, please refer to the archive description or contact the archiver.

Subject: Information Research FAQ v.4.6 (Part 1/6)

This article was archived around: 06 Apr 2002 06:54:07 GMT

All FAQs in Directory: internet/info-research-faq
All FAQs posted in: alt.internet.research, sci.research
Source: Usenet Version


Archive-name: internet/info-research-faq/part1 Posting-Frequency: monthly Last-modified: Feb 2001 URL: http://spireproject.com Copyright: (c) 2001 David Novak Maintainer: David Novak <david@spireproject.com>
The Information Research FAQ 100 pages of search techniques, tactics and theory by David Novak of the Spire Project (SpireProject.com) Welcome. This FAQ addresses information literacy; the skills, tools and theory of information research. Particular attention is paid to the internet as both a reservoir and gateway to information resources. This FAQ is an element of the Spire Project, the primary free reference for information research and an important source for search assistance. Do visit http://spireproject.com . It is free and compliments this FAQ with links, forms and tools. We also publish a fine All-in-one search page, a collection of our best search tools called Spire Project Light (http://spireproject.com/spir.htm). This FAQ resides as text at http://spireproject.com/faq.txt and http://spireproject.co.uk/faq.txt and with pictures at http://spireproject.com/faq.htm *** The Spire Project also delivers a 3 hour public seminar called *** Beyond Boolean: exceptional internet research. This is *** a fast paced demonstration supported with webbing, reaching *** beyond the ground covered on our website and FAQs. Please visit *** http://SpireProject.com/seminar.htm for synopsis and venues. *** Register you interest and we will try to come to your city. Enjoy, David Novak - david@spireproject.com The Spire Project : SpireProject.com and SpireProject.co.uk . . Prelude. 1 . . . . . . . Everyday searching has a simple approach. 2 . . . . . . . Searching for specific, quality information demands a more complex approach. 3 . . . . . . . Let's understand how information is arranged on the internet. 4 . . . . . . . Each format (book, article, web, etc...) has unique search tools and resources. 5 . . . . . . . Specific guidance on libraries, discussion groups and other venues. 6 . . . . . . . Review and discuss types of information in specific fields. 7 . . . . . . . Boolean, proximity, field searching, Dewey and patent classification. 8 . . . . . . . Quality depends on source, currency, search process, reliability... 9 . . . . . . . Commercial information industry, libraries and the info-broker. 10 . . . . . . . Information moves and evolves in fascinating ways. 11 . . . . . . . Steps to improve an online search. 12 . . . Prelude. Many of us unwittingly digest great amounts of information in the course of a day. Our information needs are more modest and usually repetitive. When we have questions, we reach for a small collection of preferred information sources close at hand with a collection of assessments as to what is credible and trusted. As a child, these sources include the school library, an encyclopedia and parents. All the sources are trusted. As an adult, these sources include the state library, the newspaper, bookstores and current magazines. Adults understand truth has become a little more relative, but when the evening news declares presidential hopeful George W Bush is ahead by 3% (on a sample of 707) we slip into thinking he is leading. There is more to information literacy. It is, after all, a profession. There are tools you know nothing about and techniques you have never heard of. There is a specialized vocabulary just made to confuse you. Research, or rather information research (to distinguish it from lab-coat style research) is so very much more involved. Yet there is great simplicity to research too. Just under the murky mist of confusing resources rests a solid platform to stand on. In any one field there are just a handful of databases, directories and periodicals to consider. After decades of library and information industry evolution, clearly valuable sources have already floated to the top, monopolizing their respective fields. Most cities have just one or two primary newspapers. Large industries like book publishing have few book databases and a handful of primary book distributors. Enters the internet: not so much a change of information as a revolution in access to information. Previously you could justify having just a handful of preferred information sources because these were the sources easily available. Today, and the future, is filled with information close at hand. We are dropped into a morass of competing information just waiting to capture our attention, and strain both our capacity to absorb information and our capacity to understand the differences between sources. A great segment of our community will fall back to tried and true information sources they grew up with: state library, bookstore, local newspaper. The better alternative sources will be ignored for no particular reason. The rush of the information revolution will push past them. They will only hear of changes when their information needs suddenly change - and they are confronted with a vast collection of unfamiliar options, and struggle with understanding what sources they need. A smaller segment of our community, by virtue of frequently tackling questions best answered with unfamiliar sources, will be driven to understand the information world: to become truly information literate. There is another story here too. The way our society handles information is undergoing some very fascinating changes. Any predictions for the future should acknowledge the tension and flow of information in our society. Take, for example, the vast surplus of information emerging on the internet, and the convulsions of the commercial information industry in response. Rather than focusing on how information is organized, we can also focus on how information becomes organized. The who, where and why of information, the sociological perspective, adds meaning to the phrase "information revolution". - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It was another warm day. The young Egyptian boy strode purposely out the gate towards the river. The Nile was low this time of year. Very abundant with fish and bird life. With luck, Shakh would return at sunset with food for the pantry. Mother would be pleased with that. Shakh knew fishing had changed little over the last hundred years. The walls of his family's ancestral home had just such a scene of his grandfather fishing on the Nile from a small reed boat. The thinly carved relief was complete with spear, fish, ducks and Shakh's grandmother nearby holding lotus flowers. Shakh stopped by old-man Jacob on his short walk to the bank of the Nile. He liked the old trader. Years ago Jacob had traveled to the Levant and brought back many strange artifacts. Some even came as far a field as the Harrapan people who were said to live beyond Sheba, across the waves, some three years journey away. He especially liked the small black head carved in a style so unlike anything else Shakh had seen. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Harrapan people lived on the banks of the great Indus river in modern-day Pakistan. A great civilization almost on par with the Sumerians and the more distant Egyptians, very little remains today. They built vast cities of clay brick with rectangular city blocks. They built drains, public toilets and state granaries. They were the first to populate the Indus river valley. (see http://www.harappa.com/indus2/index.html) Little remains. The Harrapan civilization fell with the arrival of the Aryan race and the intervening millennia treated their past poorly. The arrival of Islam erased much of their history as did the shifting Indus river itself. The British used the bricks from one ancient city in the construction of a great railway. Only today are the archaeological digs once again unearthing the past. I search for Harrapa on the internet. Nothing special, just type 'Harrapa' into any of the popular search engines and I uncover harrapa.com, a website devoted to some recent information from these digs. Looks good. Pictures of ancient pots. Children's toys. A map to an ancient city. Of course, Shakh would have known of the Harrapan civilization. While it is uncertain ancient Egyptian ever visited in person, goods and rumors traveled far from trader to trader. Ancient Egyptians, while not accomplished conquerors abroad, did travel and mix with distant peoples. Shakh lived in a civilization centuries distant from us, yet both you and Shakh know a similar amount about the Harrapan civilization. The intervening years have not made everything clear. Even the information revolution has not changed the facts. Both you and Shakh have just a single source of information about the Harrapan civilization. You have the pictures on harrapa.com and our short excerpt here. Shakh has the old-man's art object to look at, the old-man's myth of a civilization beyond the waves. This story carves the act of searching in deep relief. Searching is a skill, a trade and to some a profession. It is also just a simple task of finding information - something we do every day, in so many ways, without any of the difficulties we will get into later in this FAQ. The difficulties only emerge when you want to do something spectacular. Should you wish to know something specific about the Harrapan civilization, or understand something contentious - then we require a greater degree of expertise and experience. The search becomes a challenging adventure in its own right. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Nile was always a slow river but three months out of the year it burst its banks and flooded the fields, bringing life on the banks of the Nile to a complete halt. For these three months Shakh's family would move into the ancestral home in the streets surrounding the great pyramids. It was an old home, centuries old. Well suited to their needs with a storeroom for food, separate rooms for the parents, and an active social life in close proximity to others. In many ways, this was the most exciting time for young Shakh. For the rest of the year he lived in relative isolation in the village by the Nile. For these three months, he lived in a city, bustling with activity, construction and recreation. Shakh had expected this year to be like the last but his father secured Shakh an important position - he would be in training to become a scribe. Father had grand plans for young Shakh, plans that extended far beyond life as a scribe. What's more, with luck and further prosperity, Shakh's father had the means to secure his further advance. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Much of ancient Egypt is available for us to read off the walls of the many remaining buildings. They were not a literate nation, yet were able to adorn almost everything with writing and pictures. They lived in the most enlightened society of the day. Years later, Egypt would gift the fledgling Hellenic state a full third of their Greek vocabulary. This is part of the reason for such an interest in travelling to Egypt. It is the visual symbols that inform us and draw us in so deeply. Standing before the great religious statues, we begin to feel how it was to live and work in that day. To run amok as a young student, waiting for the Nile to subside once again. Yet, there is much more to knowing ancient Egypt than just the monuments and wall reliefs. Years of study has recovered their lost language of hieroglyphs. Years of archaeology has unearthed their daily lives. History and Archaeology are fine examples of searching in practice. Both fields struggle openly with the bias and uncertainty each new fact brings forth. Malta is a small island off the coast of Sicily, close to Tunisia. Should evidence emerge of ancient Egyptians living on Malta, what does it mean? Was Malta an Egyptian conquest or an occasional station for their fishing fleet? This uncertainty applies to all information, in all situations. One of the first events for the new regime in Pakistan was to acknowledge that important national statistics, like the national GDP figures, had been fudged to a serious and significant degree. Important national statistics are not intrinsically true because of their source. This is not a problem solely of underdeveloped nations. Rumor suggests that during the height of Singapore's land value bubble their national figures were unreliable too. Searching is a skill and an attitude. In this FAQ we progressively unfold the way information is found. Initially, let's cover a simple way to find information; a structured approach to an everyday problem. Afterwards, we shall look more closely, and with more complexity, at the world of information. Searching is Simple. Section 1 Searching is simple. It starts with a question. It ends with an answer. Everything between is searching. Much of it has to do with the tools you use. Select the right tool and you can get to the answer almost by default. Luckily, for any given topic there tends to be just a handful of must-use tools. For more complicated questions, there are usually plenty of people to ask for assistance. The answers you are seeking will be found in a selection of different formats. In this I mean books, articles, interviews, and more. This is a very convenient concept and forms the foundation to all our work both here and in the Spire Project. Few research tools cover more than a single format; those that do, tend to cover each format poorly. Start a search by selecting the specific format you are seeking. Then, select your preferred search tool from a small collection specific to that format. To get the information, simply follow through and read, search or interview. Everything follows naturally. Have a Question. Select a Format. Select a Search Tool. There are just a few formats to consider. Books . . . . . Dense, factual, comprehensive and a minimum of 6 months to a year old. Articles . . . . . Shorter than books but focused on one topic. News . . . . . Short and shallow. Immediate. Statistics . . . . . Factual. More reliable. Theses . . . . . Very thick. Deeply researched. Esoteric. Webpages . . . . . Immediate, mixed quality, with limited factual support. Interviews . . . . . Immediate, varied quality, partly digested. Each format has a selection of simple tools to find information. Many of these tools will be on the internet - which may mean easily accessible. A word of caution: try not to confuse search tools that happen to be on the internet with searching internet information. The Amazon.com book catalogue is a search tool useful in locating books. Though on the web, searching Amazon is part of a book search, not a web search. A search of the Reuters newswire is a news search, not a web search, even though Reuters releases current news on the web. Each format should remain distinct in your mind. Tools to Find Books 1) Some books, particularly classics, are free on the internet through efforts like Project Gutenberg. 2) Libraries allow you to read books. Library catalogues are frequently online. 3) The largest libraries, like the Library of Congress and the British Library, list millions of books in their online catalogues. 4) Most currently available 'in print' books are listed in national Books-in-Print databases. 5) Each country maintains a special government publication database. 6) Lastly, online bookstore catalogues like that of Barnes & Noble, list a sizeable portion of current in-print books. Tools to Find Webpages 1) Global search engines index hundreds of millions of webpages for free text searching. Consider Altavista and All-the-Web. 2) Global directories list resources by category. Consider Yahoo or the Open Directory Project. 3) Regional search engines and directories focus more tightly on regionally important topics. 4) Lastly, more specialized search tools, from search engines which focus on specific topics (like maths or government webpages), services which link you to important topic-specific websites, and services which manually review websites, all can take you further. Tools to Find News 1) Current news is found in newspapers and the evening news. News clips can be delivered electronically, or purchased through specialist news clipping services. 2) Newswires redistribute regional news to a larger audience. Many newswires release their text news free online. 3) Specialized search engines like NewsBlip and TotalNews aggregate current online news. 4) State libraries archive past copies of regional papers. 4) Individual newspapers maintain libraries of previous articles. Many are available as commercial databases. 5) Larger commercial databases unite the news from many prominent newspapers. These databases of news articles stretch back many years. This story is repeated with all the formats information comes in. To drum this in with repetition, searching starts with a question. Select the format (book, news or webpage). Next, select one or more tools from our short list of search tools for that format. Want to understand the lifecycle of the spider? A book should prove useful. Let's look at either our local library book catalogue or a big commercial bookstore catalogue like Barnes & Noble (http://bn.com). Search. Read. Voila, the lifecycle of the spider. If searching appears a little boring at this point, you have not visited a library recently. The excitement comes in finding the information. The rest is dull indeed. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The information revolution washes over us, picks us up and pushes us forward like so much driftwood. From now on our lives will forever be awash with information. We will eat it. Breathe it. Live in it. Drown in it. Some of us will even learn to live for it. Those most capable will have the skills to search, sift and sort information. The information revolution is not about primary research, lab coats and discovery. It is about a surplus of information. The searching we have just discussed is not a particularly creative process. Simple searching is not sufficient to deal with the great tide of information moving against us. But then, simple searching lacks finesse. Simple searching is, well, simple. Searching is one of those most delightful tasks where skill is everything. A search without talent will give you just a taste. Like pottery perhaps. Anyone can get something but only an expert can accomplish wonders. Quality information, reliable answers, effective coverage of resources; it takes skill to get to this level. Advances in technology and the delivery of search assistance has made searching easier than ever before. Many search tasks can be accomplished without any experience. With more challenging questions a novice will get results - results they will be proud of. But not results they should be proud of. With experience, you will recognize how much more is possible. Let's proceed by adding a little more complexity. Searching is Complex Section 2 Your value as a searcher is directly related to the number of resources you can reach for quickly, and your skill at phrasing a research question. Consequently, as a searcher, you will work hard at building ready access to a range of resources. You also work hard at understanding the special characteristics of collections of information. The technical name for complex searching is 'Information Research'. I prefer to think of information research as an effort to locate answers, efficiently. Information Research is not vague browsing of available information for something that interests you. It is not browsing the library bookshelf or reading the newspaper, nor is it internet surfing. Information research is searching with a purpose ... and it is hard work. Research is also an art form. The skills, tools, and resources we work with are only the canvass and paints of an artist. Research extends from commercial, legal, reporting, through the skills of interviewing, database searching, and research analysis using books, articles, experts and patents. Research is so large a field, involving so many skills, tools and resources, you will quickly find you do not wish to learn it all. At the heart of information research lies a simple motto: "Someone, somewhere, probably knows the answer." To quote The Information Broker's Handbook (Sue Rugge and Alfred Glossbrenner): "As information brokers, we shouldn't consider ourselves capable of providing solutions... What we 'can' provide, and what sets a really good information broker apart from the rest, are resources. We can provide the client with the kinds of information he or she needs ... that make it possible for individuals to solve their problems." Let this sink in. We are not experts in the field we are researching. Collecting information on the moons of Jupiter? Do not pretend to be an astronomer. We are only experts at the tools for gathering information. A Quick Introduction to Effective Searching. 1) Searchers work hard to properly frame the question. 2) Searchers know the technology, know where to look. 3) Searchers know you can ask. Step One: Properly Frame the Question The preparation of your question is critical. There is a galaxy of difference between a young student asking, "I am interested in trees", and a specific, attainable question like "Where would I find a tree surgeon I can talk to?" The information sphere is very large and rather confusing. Each item of information has aspects of authenticity, accuracy, reliability, and bias. Information comes in many formats: interviews, books, articles, statistics. We learn about information from many sources: literature, discussion, resource lists, experience. There are also personal issues: budget, time, depth and purpose. With all this to think about, we must be very careful about each question we ask. This issue is vital once we start an article search, and can easily mean the difference between 5 concise articles, and hundreds of general articles. The essence of our question is the manner with which we approach the information sphere. The question directs our efforts. One key is to treat searching as an art, much like painting or photography. The true mark of an artist, and the primary step wanna-be artists miss, is visualizing what you want before you begin. When searching, sit down and visualize what a successful search would look like in this situation. How many pages? How many documents? What kind of authors and what kind of quality of document? Go through the whole gamut of different types of research tools and describe it. Would a simple three-line newspaper article be a success? Would a 20-year-old dissertation be acceptable? Would a short conversation with an expert suffice? Would all three together suffice? (This approach works exceptionally well with internet research too.) If you can phrase a question in a way that lends itself to your resources, you are far more likely to get the answers desired. Oddly, this often means you are asking for places where the information resides rather than asking directly for the information. A novice starts with a question like, "What can I do for my exceptional child?" You should rephrase this question immediately. "What resources will help me help my exceptional child." These are both valid questions but the second question has a distinct answer - the first is far too vague. Other questions could be "What are other parents doing for their exceptional child?" or "Who can help advise me on how to teach my exceptional child." Now we shape the question to get precise answers. "Where do I find a definitive list of associations?" (or a search for "+association +directory") works much better than, "What association works with exceptional children?" What about, "Who would know of associations for exception children?" and, "Are there pamphlets of advice for parents of exceptional children?" and, "What umbrella organizations/specialist libraries exist for exceptional children?" Questions are not right or wrong, just better or worse at illuminating certain aspects of the answer. Make sure your questions illuminate something useful. There are ways to frame questions for commercial databases, for research assistance, for interviews, for getting the truth from to your children. Your skill in phrasing the question has a lot to do with the results. Poor questions tend to come back and haunt us later when you miss relevant information. Set aside ample time to refresh and reframe your questions. Step Two: Know the Technology, Know Where to Look. Research rests on understanding the technology and an awareness of the resources. In the example above, a directory of associations does exist. Here in Australia it is the "Directory of Australian Associations", found in most important Australian libraries. The Australian "Department of Education" has a major interest in promoting exceptional children. In Western Australia, Infolink, a community information service, should have a record of major community groups for exceptional students. I have no direct knowledge of umbrella organizations or specialist libraries, though I expect both the education department and Infolink would. A quick search of some large libraries may help us find some of the pamphlets. Knowing of specific resources is helpful. It is great if you live next door to the president of Mensa. You have easy access to someone knowledgeable, able to give his or her take on the situation. Knowing the tools to help you find resources, the meta-resources, is vital. So what if we do not know exceptional students come under the Department of Education. Do we know who to ask to find the government department involved? If you do not know of the directory of associations, who or where would you look for one? Being unfamiliar with meta-resources is a serious handicap - you will find yourself searching hours for something a professional would do on the phone while drinking coffee. Keep in mind the Spire Project is dedicated to providing you some of this experience. Our web articles should suggest directions to look. But there are limits to how we can help. At some point you simply must sit down with the Kompass Directory, or the Gale Directory of Databases, or the Australian Bureau of Statistics library, and become familiar with getting to all the relevant information. Another must, for all searching, is experience searching electronic databases with complex research queries - a difficult task only made better with practice. As a general rule, if you don't use Fields, Proximity and Boolean search terms, you are doing it wrong. Most people do it wrong. Step Three: Know You Can Ask. There is very little mystery about professional research. Lots of people are experienced in different aspects of this field. My personal weak point is in direct interviewing where as I am a pioneer in secondary resource research. This is OK. In fact I use this liberally to determine the skill of professional researchers - do they know their own limits? The field is much too large to be an expert in all its aspects. The positive site to this is many people welcome requests for help. I enjoy asking librarians questions. I also ask my customers, my suppliers and other professional researchers. Never get caught in the trap of feeling you know what to do. The joy in this profession is that most people do not expect you to be an expert in their field, just an expert in your field: particularly the meta-resources. Even if it requires a polite reminder, customers will appreciate you asking them for likely keywords in difficult searches. I always make a habit of asking librarians if I am missing something. A librarian is always fluent in their collections and I frequently locate real gems this way. (As an example, my state library arranges computer books in two sets, one Dewey and another in an alternative structure. Who would have guessed?) Especially if you are just a student, always keep your ears open. You will frequently find yourself in the presence of some expert in some facet of research telling you something you already know. Consider carefully before you interject... Your expert may be about to explain something new to you. Information research is a dedication to learning. At its heart is a collection of specific research skills, an awareness of research tools, and a gifted mind. - Oh, and a large amount of coffee. Without knowledge of and access to relevant research-worthy resources, your research will be severely limited and doubtful. This is why much of your work becoming an effective researcher involves learning about the resources and meta-resources for your field. Much of our work in the Spire Project is drawing your attention to relevant resources. Before we progress to specific resources for specific formats (books, webpages, news), let us attack head on the role of the internet in information research. This should surprise you. The Internet Format. Section 3 As Shakh became more proficient with writing, father wrote more frequently of the family deity. Horus, the falcon god, had long watched over his family. Horus sees all, his father would write, and even across the many miles separating you from us, Horus will watch over you and keep you close. It was a great comfort to Shakh to have the family deity looking after him. Shakh too devoted himself to a life of watching and knowing. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - We have discussed how information comes packaged in certain standardized formats like books, articles or news clips. Each format has particular qualities and standards that reflect the way the information is prepared. For example books are dense, factual, comprehensive and a minimum of 6 months to a year old. So how can we apply this newfound wisdom to the internet? Let's start at the beginning. The internet is an inexpensive and pervasive system for the delivery of data. It is also the medium of a dramatic shift in the way we access information. A (1) dramatic drop in the cost of publishing is fuelling (2) the liberation of information from previously closed systems, leading to (3) an emergence of alternative funding for certain public resources and (4) an eagerly awaited 'direct to consumer' commercial information industry. The first mental knot to untie is the separation of internet resources into distinct formats. Electronic books share most of the qualities of books published on paper. News stories found on the web share all of the qualities of news in your local newspaper. The fact they are electronic or appear as webpages has nothing to do with it. News is news. Electronic books are almost books. But if online news is news, and online books are almost books, and both are not internet formats, what is an internet format? The search-by-format method is a concept to simplify and understand the many information resources which exist in the world. The concept is only as valuable as it is successful at enlightening us. As to the internet, we have more to learn, but could safely divide the internet into several formats at this time, perhaps webpages, online discussion and ftp resources. Yet this is largely superficial. The real value comes from understanding the qualities of different types of webpages. We shall divide the webpage format further. Must we really learn this? You would be pardoned for equating searching and the internet. Much of the hype surrounding internet search tools builds the illusion that the skill of searching can somehow be distilled computationally then delivered to you electronically. Through the wonders of modern science, you can have the best information at your finger tips without having learn anything of search technology. This is a pervasive lie (or marketing fiction). The electronic research industry has been around for decades and has worked on this problem for some time. No upstart internet guru has invented a technique to suddenly transform the search process. Such thinking would work in section two (Searching is Easy) but is the first illusion we must shatter for you to progress. Case in point, Lycos and All-the-Web search engines use the same database of webpages. This database is growing rapidly, it stood at 350,000,000 webpages in June 2000 and hopes to reach one billion webpages by the end of 2001. It stands as a grand achievement in organization, right? Wrong. Years ago I was using a unified database of news called Global Textline (no longer available but replaced by others). It had an astounding four billion news articles available for advanced text searching! Four billion news items, representing many years of news from all over the world. This was superficially 10 times the size of the current All-the-Web search engine. No, the internet does not even hold the record for being the largest information field. Oh, it will surely surpass the quantity of commercial information, and superficially we could say it may already have achieved this. But the internet is not a new medium for information research. It is emerging as a new resource, not a new phenomenon. The internet is a new medium for business - most businesses have never incorporated the immediacy or global nature of internet involvement, so considerable rethinking is required. The internet is a new medium for publishing for almost all of us; very few of us published electronically before the internet emerged. The internet is NOT a new medium for research. Information researchers have been working electronically for years. The internet is just a new resource we can reach for with strengths, weaknesses and peculiar traits we must appreciate. By way of an example, let us compare Link Analysis as used in Google and Raging (of Altavista) with the process of editorial vetting as used in scientific journals. Through the magic of link analysis, we can make certain assumptions about the value of a webpage by adding up the number of other pages linking to that page. In its simplest form, webpages with at least 100 inbound links from other websites are judged to be quality, valuable resources. A webpage without any inbound links has the suspicion of being of poorer quality. After all, no one has thought it valuable enough to add a link to their further resources page. This logic has some serious shortcomings. Firstly, the process rewards long-term projects that have been online long enough to earn links. A brilliant new webpage would have few links - yet. It would be ranked poorly, undeservedly. Secondly, link analysis rewards websites over webpages. The pages with the most links are often homepages. Rating homepages over second level webpages works at odds to keyword searching. Our keywords will be found in specific, perhaps second-tier webpages. Links go to the top level. Thirdly, link analysis is a mass market, popular technique. You are banking on the intellectual finesse of a mass of mindless computer users much like yourself. It is the same kind of popular democratic selection that votes B-grade actors into the presidency. Let's contrast this with the process of editorial vetting used in scientific journals. Each article is reviewed by a selection of knowledgeable peers who understand the topic is great depth. Each article is further improved by the editing of the journal editors, and by self-editing, for there is great competition and prestige at stake. Only a handful of the many submissions are judged worthy and appear in the printed journal. Success places the successful in the standard of record; stamped with an external statement of truth and importance. Of course, the logic of editorial vetting also has shortcomings. Firstly, the process is time and effort intensive. Many of the most important journals will delay six months or more between submission and publication. In our digital era this is increasingly unacceptable. Secondly, the number of submissions accepted are at odds with the pace of development. So much more happens in the world than can be digested in this manner. Thirdly, editorial vetting supports the clannish behavior leveled against the upper echelons of science. New and novel developments have difficulty floating to the top if the peer review process should not be open to new ideas. If link analysis is popular and democratic, editorial vetting is elitist and autocratic. Both approaches have pros and cons. Once you have absorbed the drama between link analysis and editorial vetting, please do not retain the belief that your search needs will be completely solved for you. Searching is a complex, overgrown garden and its time to get your hands dirty. So what does the internet have to do with searching? The internet changes searching in two ways. Firstly, the webpage is a new format to contend with. "Webpages are often of unknown age, of only guessed at quality and potentially the easiest information to retrieve. There are many points of entry to web resources but search tools differ. Try to match your search tool to your question." (See http://spireproject.com/webpage.htm) The internet is also a conduit to many of the pre-existing tools for searching other formats (books, news, interviews). With an internet connection, we can reach database retailers and many commercial quality databases like LOCOC, ERIC, MOCAT and AGIP directly from the source. We can also remotely search the catalogue of most libraries in the world. These are not new resources, just new ways to reach them. In this day of interconnectivity and change, it is too tempting to declare the information industry is in rapid flux. Everything I have learned suggests this is not so. There are some changes associated with new channels but by and large the process of searching for information remains the same. Let's look briefly at news as an example. News articles are written by the reporter, sold to international newswires which then distribute these stories to interested newspapers and news channels, that incorporate the news into your newspaper or evening TV news. Journalist - Newswire - Newspaper/News show - You. News would also be added to commercial databases of past news. These databases are then provided to database retailers like Dialog or Lexis-Nexis who sell occasional access to you. Journalist - Newswire - Commercial Database - Database Retailer - You. With the internet, newswires have also provided their text news to online sites. Text news is thus available for you to browse or search. Journalist - Newswire - Internet News Sites - You. I draw your attention to several facts. The fundamental nature of the industry has not changed. Journalists and newswires still impart upon the news the same nature as before. It is short, shallow, immediate. It is created to journalistic standards. If you wish to search past news, you must still reach for the commercial database, most likely through a database retailer. Searching for news online only goes back two weeks at most. Lastly, to date only the text format for news is widely disseminated. Sometimes a couple of pictures are included but the visual news, as used in the evening news on TV, is sure to remain priced beyond public consumption. So what has changed? There is another venue for you to pick up the news. There are opportunities for new databases to be created, some of limited time (like totalnews.com - a database of current news on other websites). Little else has changed. The creation and dissemination of news remains pretty much as before the internet arrived. Let us look even more briefly at book publishing. Books are produced by authors, improved by editors, published by publishers, marketed by bookstores, then purchased by you. Author - Editors - Publishers - Bookstores - You. Today we have a couple of new online bookstores - and a large number of new old online bookstores (existing bookstores now selling online). We have a collection of free books online (largely classics like Shakespeare, which strangely, were immediately published as really inexpensive paperback classics available in airports everywhere). There are also a range of very useful commercial quality book databases which have become free to search online. I am thinking the government publication catalogues (MOCAT [US], AGIP [Australia] and Stationery Office Online Catalogue [UK]) and the online catalogues for the Library of Congress (LOCOC) and the British Library. Lastly, the online catalogue to the large bookstores like Barnes and Noble, Amazon and The Internet Bookshop (UK's WHSmith) can provide a free and fast database of books in print, though not as good as the commercial Books-in-Print databases. Of course, any local bookstore will offer to search books-in-print for you, so this is not as revolutionary as it might at first appear. In summary, we have a collection of recently discounted book databases we can more easily search, we have additional sites to buy books, and little else. The creation and dissemination of books remains pretty much as before the internet arrived. Has the book industry changed? Not really. The most remarkable change has been the emergence of group discussion online, the emergence of a new format for information (like the webpage) and the opportunities to connect faster to a whole range of pre-existing searchable resources. This is the reason why we discuss searching-by-format. Later, at the end of this FAQ, we return to this topic and show that the real revolution is not in resources or industry or search tools but a revolution in immediate access. Access, it turns out, enriches the art of searching. Pessimistically. On counterpoint, as an information resource, the internet can still be much too limited for many situations. If we are not careful, searching the internet becomes no better than browsing the shelf of your state library. What most impresses me about the internet is the promise of changes in the future. The internet as a system suggests radical improvements to the current decade-old systems that have attained their search-worthy status. What impresses me most are the improvements mostly still in the future, not yet proven, set to remain promising ventures for a time. This is not to say internet research can not be rewarding. In some fields like computer studies, the internet has already surpassed parity with books, articles and associations. Just when you will consult the internet as a research-worthy resource depends on cost, effort, and the quality of the information returned. This judgement call requires more than a little experience. Value is important. I sincerely hope we can suppress our enthusiasm for free information in favour of a truer appraisal of the value of information. Make no mistake, commercial information is brilliant. It is almost heresy to even compare commercial information with the results of a few hours on the internet. Internet Information Theory Let us agree the internet is great fun to surf but more challenging when you have a specific question in mind. To improve our search skills, we begin by understanding how information is arranged on the internet. Contrary to myth, information is not disorganized but rather organized very carefully along clear patterns. Many patterns are specific to the information format (text document, webpage, email message, printed article). Further patterns match the way we become aware of information, or are specific to the information systems (mailing list, FAQ, peer-reviewed journal). Your understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each pattern, each format, each system, guides your search for information. We shall start by shattering the internet, and commenting on the many pieces. Three Definitions of the Internet Do be careful when using the word 'internet'. 1_ The internet is a physical network; more than a million computers continuously exchanging information. The internet allows us to transfer information around the world. 2_ The internet is a landscape of information available on almost every topic imaginable. This information appears almost chaotically distributed to the world but holds clear patterns. For instance, linking information together are various structures like government web links, search engines and FAQ documents. 3_ The internet is a community of 500+ million individuals. These are real people who choose to interact, discuss and share information online. In this example, let me just draw your attention to the way most of our research effort focuses on the second definition: a landscape of information. Much of the best information originates in the third definition: the internet is a community. Sometimes it is far more effective to ask real people than search the information cyberspace. What I just mentioned is not so important as the technique I just used. I broke the large seemingly chaotic system into smaller pieces: pieces that hopefully make more sense. Eventually, when we've made sense of the little bits, perhaps we can comment astutely on the big-picture. Information, transaction, entertainment There is a triad of functions to all online activity: Function - Activity - Unit ---------------------------------------- Information - Research - The Fact or Conclusion Exchange - Business - The Transaction Entertainment - Play - The Experience Each internet function grows at a different rate and moves in a different direction. The development of forums is firmly in the smallest segment dealing with information. This segment is quite poorly organized and confusing. The entertainment function in contrast is well financed and graphically innovative with clear, profitable opportunities. Much of the web is prepared with Exchange or Entertainment in mind. "Brochureware" (purely promotional webpages) is rarely required for research but is critical to securing a transaction. Entertainment related or just entertaining websites abound. Let us recognize just how few webpages are information & research related. My own experience suggests we are just beginning to see the movements towards profiting from providing information. Direct selling of information is still chaotic and unrewarding. Information Formats The way information is packaged has a great bearing on the content, quality and use of the information. This theme is evident throughout the work of the Spire Project, and is particularly applicable to internet information. Webpages, text files, software, email and database entries each have particular qualities. Each shapes, constrains and restricts the informative content. These particular qualities apply irrespective of the information involved. Books are dense, factual, a little old. Articles are short, sharp, more recent. News is puff, introductory, immediate. Each way the information is packaged, each format, presents the information to set standards. Information formats on the internet are the same. Webpages are graphical, technical to produce, and not easily updated. FAQs are easier to maintain, text only, and attract more peer review. Mailing lists are simpler still, text, short, immediate, very peer-reviewed, characterized by discussion and resource discovery. Newsgroups are characterized by extremely low costs, vulnerable to trashing, poorly managed. Email is simple use, one-to-one discussion. Let's look at books more closely. Books are created by authors who have something to write. Books are printed and marketed by Publishers to the bookstores that then provide it to the readers. Each facet of this process defines the resource. Books have quality, editorial vetting but minimal peer-review, marketable value and a potentially lengthy preparation time. When it comes to research, why look for a book when investigating digital money? Books would just have the wrong qualities - would present the information poorly. We need a more current format (digital money is a fast moving topic), and a more peer-reviewed format (books have editorial vetting but not intrinsic peer-review). Why not search for a mailing list, an FAQ, or an association website. These formats have qualities more appropriate to our question. Information Preparation Information flows also impress patterns on internet information. Most information is transplanted to the web - first created elsewhere. The source of information imparts as much pattern as the eventual format the information takes. Information may appear as a webpage, and conform to our expectations for all webpages but the information may have been prepared from the discussion on a mailing list - and thus enjoy a more topical, specific, timely and peer-reviewed quality. Let's look at FAQs. The best resource in the world on copyright law is the musings of a group of copyright lawyers who form the copyright mailing list. The copyright FAQ supported by this group is a logical document summarizing much of the discussion of this mailing list. FAQs are vetted by the news.answers team, then automatically mirrored around the world. From its origins in the mailing list, the FAQ is a peer-reviewed document, often full of links to further resources, topical, knowledgeable and factual. As an FAQ, the document is not immediate, graphical or financially rewarding (some FAQs stagnate). Only some internet information is created within the internet environment. The concept of 'brochureware' describes the common traits to promotional webpages directly prepared from paper promotional brochures. One of the more exciting trends is the movement of information from the dusty shelves of government offices and association libraries to their more accessible websites. The quality of information retained in your average government agency, from quality research reports, to detailed studies, to current industry monitoring is very high. These qualities are then brought over to the web format. Such web-documents tend to be isolated (not linked to other related resources) and perhaps a little behind the time line but of a generally high quality. An exciting holistic view of the internet information landscape is based on these descriptions. Imagine, for a moment, information flowing through a collection of systems. At certain points, information groups together, and generates new, perhaps higher quality information, which then flows in a different system, a different direction, to different people. The flow of information from one person to another, from one format to another, imprints qualities to the information along the way. Each organization, or subsequent re-organization, imparts specific styles and conventions and quality to the result. Publishing Motivation Let us proceed to a third set of patterns. Information appears on the internet for one very specific reason. Someone Publishes (DUH). The motivation behind publishing colours the information. This is a pattern we can use to quickly judge the contents of a webpage. Ask yourself who is publishing, and why. One of the biggest publishing segment a year ago were individuals publishing documents derived from their personal expertise. A typical document would be one with minimal peer review, a list of aging links to further resources, simple graphics, variable to short length, prone to bias but moderately reliable because the publisher knows their topic well. These pages are often located on web pages with private sub-directories (usually starting /~name/). Commercial sites publish mainly for the promotional value. Their secondary purpose is to provide sales information to prospective clients. Rarely do commercial sites go beyond this. Commercial webpages often reside on their own domain name, as a .com, or in sub-directories - without the tilde symbol. Commercial sites also tend to age badly. They are very noticeable from their front page. Government agencies are emerging as valued publishers. Slowly their dormant information becomes available through this new medium. Currently almost all government documents on the internet also appear in print, meaning they are factual, exhaustively reviewed, tend to be a little old (but age well), and come from highly paid knowledgeable people who believe it is their duty to inform others. Such documents are lengthy and appear on .gov domains. These patterns are simple to see. Grant-funded projects create brilliant research resources and hold much promise in pushing the limits of this technology. I am eager to see the results of the US Patents project, and appreciate the value of having Supreme Court rulings on the internet. Often such projects focus deeply on content. Most projects reside on educational servers and are widely discussed within knowledgeable groups. Associations publish association-kind-of-things. Most are initially just like the commercial webpages. With time such sites become much more factual and research-worthy. Most associations are dedicated to developing awareness of their chosen topic, albeit coloured by their chosen bias. Few associations are significant publishers but in time, this segment will begin to liberate dormant information within associations. Let's summarize. The key is to always watch who is the publisher. We can assume a great deal, quickly. We are unlikely to find the latest changes to patent law from government or commercial publishers. Such organizations are simply not motivated to present such information. Promoting Information Publishing is one achievement but you and I will never read any information until we learn it exists. This simple fact creates even more patterns to internet information. Knowledge of information moves through set routes on its way from writer to reader. Promotion is not simple. It is a process that takes time, effort and perhaps money. Information without serious promotion tends not to be promoted far from the source. Another way to phrase this; you must search close to the source to find poorly promoted information. A search engine indexes pages relatively indiscriminately. This also means a site of quality is not likely to reach your attention. The odds are not good, and from a promotion point of view, search engines generate minimal traffic to your webpage. Search engines also drop you rather randomly into a website. It is often necessary to move up a directory to understand the purpose and motivation of a site you find interesting. Information published through advertising tends to have a financial payoff for the promoter. This kind of information tends to be promotional information. Brochureware. The alternatives are to promote a webpage or website through one of the referral tools. Each such tool accepts links on some criterion. Each tool you use to locate information also selects particular types of information for your attention. If you arrive at a document by recommendation through a mailing list, the document is likely to be recent, on-topic and specific to the purpose of the mailing list. Alternatively, (for poor mailing lists) it will be wildly off topic and trash. You are unlikely to see referrals to old documents or documents of historical importance. These are the qualities most acceptable to the mailing list environment. Directory trees, FAQs, guidebooks and related promotion tools all work as historically important documents. In the past, such resources list, describe and alert people to relevant information for the field. Slowly, over time, this function becomes acknowledged, reinforced and promoted. Time is the essence of this fame. Webpages or websites found through historically important documents, by their nature, tend to be long lasting websites with lasting importance in the field. Such documents point to other similar documents or websites that have achieved a long-lasting importance. You are unlikely to find specific documents but rather sites that focus or bring together information. In short, there is little motivation to link to specific webpages, when a link to an important website is just as good. Similar generalizations can be made of each type of promotional tool, and become important in rapidly seeking our information which matches our intention, as well as summarizing the likely motivation, and bias, of webpages we are interested in. Information Clumps Information Clumps. Information is created, nurtured, develops, gets transplanted, gets arranged and then becomes visible through a process which brings similar information together. As we have discussed, there are factors deeply affecting all information on the internet. Motivation, Preparation, Format and Promotion all define the quality and content of any given item of information. With so many influences, we should not be surprised to learn information naturally groups together. In reality, there is nothing natural involved - it is a social phenomenon reinforced each time you and I visit or read one resource but not another. History can explain some aspects of internet development. As a small collection of sites become dominant in particular fields, by collecting and delivering better content to more people, new sites find it progressively more difficult to capture attention. This dynamic works for websites reaching out for visitors, and discussion groups reaching out for subscribers. In each case, seniority counts. Seniority counts in several ways too. Promotion is directly related to quality, interest, traffic and time. The longer a site is active, the better the footpath develops, the more people visit. Secondly, quality content is directly related to access to quality content, peer review, and time/money. Important existing sites gain in every way. This results in a grand system where the first-in, best-dressed, can capture the high ground and secure a grand lead in awareness and footpath over competitors who follow. Yahoo is a prime example of a directory tree, not even the best in most areas, which has achieved unparalleled traffic & awareness. This competition is equally evident where no money is involved. Perhaps your association wishes to create a new referral website, or an open mailing list, or an informative guide. All sound concepts, effective projects. However, if older, established resources exist, the work will be long and arduous. Despite the marketing message, the internet is not a world where the best information floats to the top. The internet will not let you to reach millions. You must compete for the attention, participation, devotion and assistance in a manner very similar to building a business. In concrete terms, information clumps on the internet. The best resource could appear on any internet system (webpages, email mailing lists, ftp-archives, FAQs, online databases, newsgroups...) but we can be fairly certain the best information will congregate in just one or two. Consider this as an application of the 80:20 rule. 80% of the good information will be found on 20% of the formats, arranged concisely by 20% of the search tools. Consider our article "Searching the Web" (http://spireproject.com/webpage.htm). We progressively search different web tools, looking for the most worthy. Searching the internet is the same. You must touch each system to see which system is dominant, where the information is congregating for your topic. Bringing this together In summary, we have broken down and discussed various qualities of published information and promoted information. We have made sweeping generalizations and educated guesses about information on the internet. Now what? When a painter begins to paint, they have already visualized some of the image. They already have a concept of the finished result. Internet research is no different. We start by building a vision of the information we seek. Who would publish it? Where would I find it? What is its motivation? How would we find it? We now have a practical vision. The address is one of the keys. The web address (or URL - Uniform Resource Locator) for any item of information gives us a surprising amount of information - particularly as we are making generalizations about information patterns. We can guess if information resides on a personal webpage, a funded university project, or a commercial project. The information resides on a .gov website? - the quality is likely to be higher and conform to our expectations of government resources. We use this new-found experience in three ways. Firstly, we restrict our searches to the most likely sources. Secondly, we quickly jump through lists of resources (such as those generated by search engines) to the sources that match our expectations. Thirdly, our assessment of information quality can be guided by our snap-judgements of its origin and purpose. Internet newcomers often expect to have instant access to the latest information at the touch of the button in beautiful colour and peer reviewed quality prose. Who is publishing this? Where is this information coming from? Who would help us find this? Such a vision is fantasy. If we were instead to look for an association website, dedicated to a certain type of research, or an informed newsgroup, maintained by people passionate about sharing this technology, then we have made four steps forward. We are clear about where to look for the answers we seek, and we will know quickly if the answers are online. Let us now leave this discussion on internet organization and internet theory. This is tough newly discovered territory, more than a little rough. I fear it will make most sense to people with considerable experience with the internet. Let us now explore the fertile grounds of understanding more familiar formats like books and news. ___________________________________________________ This document continues as Part 2/6 ___________________________________________________ Copyright (c) 1998-2001 by David Novak, all rights reserved. This FAQ may be posted to any USENET newsgroup, on-line service, website, or BBS as long as it is posted unaltered in its entirety including this copyright statement. This FAQ may not be included in commercial collections or compilations without express permission from the author. Please send permission requests to david@spireproject.com